-
Overview
Arthur Sutton is a specialist criminal and regulatory barrister, having developed a busy practice appearing in Crown, Magistrates’ and Youth Courts across the Western Circuit. He is regularly instructed on both a publicly and privately funded basis.
Arthur prosecutes and defends in all areas of crime, boasting experience in a wide variety of cases involving serious violence, theft, domestic abuse, public order, weapons, drugs, and fraud. In addition to general crime, Arthur has also built up a strong practice in road traffic matters from exceptional hardship arguments in the Magistrates’ to causing serious injury by driving in the Crown Court.
Arthur is a Grade 2 CPS Prosecutor. Recent cases Arthur has prosecuted include Non-fatal Strangulation, Possession with intent to supply Class A drugs and Dangerous Driving.
In addition to his criminal work, Arthur is building a practice in quasi-criminal and regulatory proceedings such as applications for Stalking Protection, Domestic Violence Protection, Sexual Risk and Football Banning Orders on behalf of the Police and British Transport Police, as well as local authority applications and Gun Licensing Appeals. Arthur also has experience in animal welfare matters involving the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.
-
Criminal Defence
- R v AK [2026] – Successfully overturned a conviction for stalking and quashed the Defendant’s sentence. The Defendant was accused of persistently approaching his neighbour for months after a police warning. After a thorough examination of the evidence, it transpired that the police had mistaken the neighbour which the warning was subject to. https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/man-who-stalked-woman-months-10489676
- R v DN [2025] – represented the Defendant in a case involving a knife-point robbery on a train and possession of 2 bladed articles against a vulnerable elderly victim. The starting point was one of 5 years, Arthur presented mitigation regarding the offence, his age and background which reduced the sentence to one of 3 years and 7 months.
- R v AV [2025] – represented a Defendant who had been a victim of human trafficking having been smuggled into the UK from Albania at the age of 16 and been required to repay a debt of £20,000 to his traffickers by selling drugs. In light of his strong mitigation and credit, the Court reduced his sentence from one of 4 years down to 18 months for dealing class A drugs.
- R v PJ [2025] – successfully made representations to the Prosecution to discontinue a case where the Defendant punched a police officer in response to police aggression during a Palestinian fundraising event. During the event, the Police had forced entry and used PAVA Spray against fundraisers.
- R v PT [2025] – persuaded the Crown Prosecution Service to drop charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and racially aggravated threats of violence for pleas to lesser charges. The Defendant received a suspended sentence following strong mitigation about his time serving in the armed forces stationed in Bosnia shortly after the genocide, which resulted in complex PTSD.
- R v RN [2025] – successfully appealed a dog destruction order against an XL Bully Dog in the Crown Court, after live expert evidence and submissions regarding the Defendant being a fit and proper person and the XL Bully’s temperament not constituting a danger to the public.
- R v MR [2025] – represented a young offender in an appeal, after he had wrongly served a week in custody, because the Court below had passed a manifestly excessive sentence. The Defendant was proved to be helping one of his family members by getting rid of a knife, falling just short of a reasonable excuse. The appeal was allowed and sentence quashed.
- R v HW [2025] – acted for a young offender in a case where he threatened and hit a member of the public with a machete. It was the defendant’s 3rd bladed article offence and therefore subject to a mandatory 6 months detention. Arthur successfully advanced an exceptional circumstance argument relating to the defendant’s severe epilepsy and the Court suspended the young offender’s prison sentence.
- R v KL [2025] – represented a Defendant in an attempted arson, criminal damage and possession of bladed articles case where the Defendant had attempted to set fire to a tesla car and tesla chargers, in an act against ‘Elon Musk’s nazi salute’. Persuaded the Court to reduce the starting point of 4.5 years down to 28 months for all of the offences, in part because of his distorted thinking and mental health difficulties.
- R v SS [2025] – Successfully applied to vacate a Defendant’s guilty plea after a contested hearing opposed by the Crown Prosecution Service. The complainant was found to have fabricated an allegation of assault. Persuaded the Court to impose a community order for stalking with fear of violence and 3 separate charges of Criminal Damage.
- R v LS [2024] – Acted for a Defendant who was vulnerable to modern slavery in a multi-hand supply of class A (heroin and crack) drugs case. Her flat had been cuckooed and used as a hub for county line drug dealers to operate out from. Arthur successfully persuaded the Court that she was lesser role compared to her counterparts, and she received a reduced sentence of 16 months.
- R v KE [2024] – Represented a young offender in his appeal against a prison sentence he received in the Magistrates. The Crown Court allowed the appeal and quashed the custodial sentence in light of his severe vulnerabilities including a head injury and background of being made homeless as a child. Instructing Solicitor Feedback: “That is an excellent result, thank you for assisting with this case. We will make sure he knows how lucky he was.”
- R v CC [2024] – successfully persuaded the Court to suspend a sentence of imprisonment for a Defendant who had carried out a romance fraud against his best friend where he pretended to have passed away and carried on defrauding the complainant under the guise of a fake widow, he stole over £20,000.00 from the complainant.
- R v CB [2024] – secured a bind over for a vulnerable asylum seeker in a fake document case whereby the defendant was smuggled to the UK as a child and was desperate to be reunited with his family in Brazil. Persuaded representatives of the Home Office to return the Defendant’s passport to him so he could leave the country.
-
Prosecution
- R v CB [2026] – Secured a conviction in a breach of a non-molestation order trial in the Crown Court, where the Defendant had created multiple fake identities online in order to disseminate a torrent of abuse towards the complainant even inciting his followers to hunt her down.
- R v AD & Ors [2026] – Prosecuted a multi-hander trial in the Crown Court involving a group of Palestine Action protesters vandalising private property belonging to Elbit Systems (Israel-based defence contractor). The trial involved a number of legal issues including Article 10 and 11 freedoms protecting the right to protest under the European Convention for Human Rights.
- R v TA [2025] – Prosecuted a case of fraud where the defendants had purchased multiple iPhones and expensive jewellery on finance using counterfeit documents, with the total value of the fraud being in excess of £11,000.
- R v SN [2025] – Prosecuted a possession with intent to supply Class A drugs case which took place at Bristol City’s home football ground, and successfully applied for a Football Banning Order against the Defendant.
- R v JC [2025] – Prosecuted and secured a conviction in an assault occasioning actual bodily harm involving non-fatal strangulation and beating against the Defendant’s mother, which resulted in a term of immediate imprisonment.
- R v SH [2024] – Prosecuted a defendant for theft in a dwelling where she stole family heirlooms over a value of £20,000 from her employer whilst working as a cleaner. Secured a confiscation order in POCA proceedings against the Defendant.
-
Road Traffic
- R v NB [2026] – Persuaded the Court to impose a short driving ban of 14 days as opposed to a 6-month disqualification after successful submissions regarding the impact of a lengthy driving ban against the client.
- R v TS [2025] –appealed and quashed a driving ban imposed by the Magistrates Court following a successful exceptional hardship argument in the Crown Court, where the Defendant required his licence to drive his otherwise housebound wife who had severe arthritis and mental illnesses restricting her from travelling without his guidance.
- R v SC [2025] – successful exceptional hardship argument in the Magistrates Court for a Defendant who needed his licence in order to look after 900 cattle and 500 sheep on several different farms. A driving ban would have resulted in a risk of harm and possibly death for hundreds of farm animals. Instructing solicitor feedback – “What a brilliant result! Thank you very much for representing the client for us, it would have been very detrimental for him to lose his license so he will be so relieved. Thank you again and we will send any future instructions your way.”
- R v CW [2025] – successful exceptional hardship argument in Bath Magistrates Court for a Defendant who needed her driving licence in order to support her partially blind father to travel to hospital appointments.
- R v CR [2025] – successfully persuaded the Crown Prosecution Service to offer no evidence in a case of causing serious injury by careless driving following an application to dismiss in the Crown Court which outlined the lack of evidence in the prosecution’s case. Instructing Solicitor Feedback: “Thanks again for your work Arthur! Brilliant result.”
- R v NGA [2025] – Successfully secured acquittals for 9 out of 12 speeding convictions in an appeal to the Crown Court following a half time submission of no case to answer. The appeal was allowed and his convictions and sentences were quashed. Successful application for Costs for the Defendant following his appeal.
- R v JG [2024] – successfully defended and secured an acquittal in a careless driving trial in the Magistrates Court, after effective cross examination of police witnesses to show inconsistencies in their evidence. After 30 minutes of deliberating, the Court returned a verdict of Not Guilty.
- R v JH [2024] – secured an acquittal in a Crown Court Appeal for a Defendant who was wrongly accused of drink driving, never having driven the vehicle. His appeal was allowed and conviction quashed. Feedback: “Thank you for your help today. I can’t begin to tell you the weight off my shoulders that he has been vindicated. The last 18 months have been ghastly, so glad it can be forgotten about at last.”
-
Regulatory/Quasi-Crime
- Avon & Somerset Constabulary v A [2026] – Successfully applied for the forfeiture of a company’s assets following a full day contested trial. The company was found to have obtained assets through unlawful conduct by acting as an unlicenced money exchanger.
- DVSA v N [2026] – Secured a conviction in a contested trial brought by the DVSA where a company was found to be using drivers without the correct licence to carry passengers for hire/reward.
- R v CB [2025] – Represented Gloucestershire Constabulary in the successful application for an interim stalking protection order following a contested hearing, where the Respondent is alleged to have stalked his ex-partner.
- RD v Somerset Council & Glastonbury Health Centre [2025] – Represented both the Local Authority and GP Surgery, and secured Judgment in their favour with the claims against them struck out as totally without merit. Secured an extended civil restraint order against the claimant and successfully applied for costs in the client’s favour.
